Yeatman v. Cullen
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
—This was an action of debt upon a promissory note, brought by an assignee against the makers.
The declaration contains two counts.
The first count states that on, &c., at Cincinnati, state of Ohio, to wit, at Dearborn, &c., the defendants made their note, &c., payable sixty days after date to the order of one Aaron Coon; “and that on, &c., before the note became due, at Cincinnati aforesaid, to wit, at Dearborn aforesaid, the payee, .for value received, by indorsement on the back of the note in writing, by his agent for that purpose duly authorized, transferred, assigned, and indorsed the note…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Early v. McCartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
- Glover v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Smith v. BlatchfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
- Patterson v. CarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Briggs v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.