Legal Opinion
Guepet v. International TAO Systems, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Beatrice Burstein, J.
Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment as against the corporate defendant, pursuant to CPLR 3212, is denied, for the reasons set forth hereinafter. Defendants’ cross motion for an order sanctioning plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3126, is denied as moot, since the interrogatories at issue have been served.
Plaintiff, a computer programmer, is suing the corporate defendant (hereinafter the defendant) for sums due for work, labor and services. He offers defendant’s written admissions (by its president, defendant Oscar Telesca) that the sums he seeks…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Pease & Elliman, Inc. v. 926 Park Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Pease & Elliman, Inc. v. 926 Park Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- M & S Mercury Air Conditioning Corp. v. RodolitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Gortat v. Capala Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Rivers v. Butterhill RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Gerlach v. the Horn & Hardart Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- 77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 318, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,453 Daniel Kirsch, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fleet Street, Ltd., Manny Haber, Steven Haber, Alan Haber, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.