Villenuve v. Sines
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare. (Hart, J.) Attachment proceedings under log-lien law. Defendant company brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The principal defendants, Sines & Wilson, manufactured a quantity of lumber for the Lansing Lumber Company under a written contract. Afterwards a verbal contract was made, by which Sines & Wilson agreed to haul the lumber from the mill yard to the railroad for shipment.
Plaintiff owned a team, which he sent in charge of his brother, who worked for Sines & Wilson in hauling the lumber. He filed a claim of lien for $133.20, in which he stated that the labor performed was “in manufacturing, skidding, and hauling” the lumber, describing it. In his affidavit for attachment he stated that $200 was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wiggins v. HoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Billings v. Missoula White Pine Sash Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- McGeorge v. Stanton-De Long Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Morehouse v. Shipman Lumber Servaes Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Backus v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1895