Legal Opinion

McGeorge v. Stanton-De Long Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sawyer county: John K. Parish, Circuit Judge. Action to recover on contract and to enforce a lien under sec. 8329, Stats.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sawyer county: John K. Parish, Circuit Judge. Action to recover on contract and to enforce a lien under sec. 8329, Stats. (1898). The complaint was to the effect that plaintiffs, between certain specified dates, performed services for the defendant Keene of the value of $464.74, hauling lumber and timber at an! agreed price per thousand feet, which lumber and timber belonged to. the defendant Stanton-De Long Lumber Company j that no part of said sum has been paid, and that plaintiffs have complied with all the statutory requisites to secure a…

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

Tbe sole question presented in this case is: Were plaintiffs entitled to a lien for their services in hauling tbe manufactured products from the sawmill to tbe village of Hayward, under sec. 3329, Stats. (1898), providing tbat “any person who shall do or perform any labor or services in cutting, hauling, running, felling, piling, driving, rafting, booming, cribbing, towing, sawing, peéling or manufacturing into lumber or timber any logs, timber, stave-bolts, staves, pulp wood, cordwood, railroad ties, piling, telegraph poles, telephone poles, fence posts, paving timber, tan or other barks, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGinley v. LaycockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Glover v. Hynes Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Villenuve v. SinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Billings v. Missoula White Pine Sash Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Morehouse v. Shipman Lumber Servaes Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API