Legal Opinion

Columbus Trust Co. v. Campolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1985PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that summary judgment should have been granted in favor of plaintiff. At an examination before trial, defendant admitted that the signature on the written guarantee upon which plaintiff now seeks to recover was her own. In her affidavit submitted in opposition to plaintiff’s subsequent motion for summary judgment, however, defendant apparently sought to retract her earlier admission and state that she never executed the purported guarantee. Defendant also claimed that plaintiff failed to adequately explain the full consequences of her execution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Lum v. AntonelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Columbus Trust Co. v. CampoloNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Sofio v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Garvin v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Prunty v. Keltie's Bum SteerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Pizzi v. Bradlee's Division of Stop & Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API