Legal Opinion

State v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 1980No. C-79-12-34399, CA 17729PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is a criminal case in which the defendant’s sole assignment of error is the trial court’s failure to dismiss the case against him based upon a theory of prior jeopardy. We reverse.

Defendant was charged with the theft of an oriental rug. At his first trial, one of the principal witnesses against him was a Mr. Ewaldsen, whose testimony was crucial to the prosecution’s case in that it provided proof of both the value and the identity of the rug in question.

On cross-examination, the defense attorney immediately attempted to establish bias on the part of the witness by asking him if he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. RathbunOregon Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. DawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. BattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API