Grand River Dam Authority v. Eaton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
803 P.2d 705 (1990)
GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, a public corporation, Appellee,
v.
Don E. EATON and Nadja L. Eaton, et al., Appellants.
No. 75022.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 26, 1990.
Dugie Hagberg Standeford, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Grand River Dam Authority, Vinita, for appellee.
Joe L. White, Collinsville, for appellants.
LAVENDER, Justice.
The question we decide here is whether an appeal should be deemed moot and subject to dismissal when during the pendency of the appeal to reverse a money judgment the judgment debtor, rather than either obtaining a stay of the judgment or filing a superseders…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Franzen v. DubinokCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.