Legal Opinion

Cantwell v. Hudnut

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 2, 1977No. Nos. 76-2076, 76-2077PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

Indiana’s Uni-Gov statute,1 unifying the local governments of Indianapolis and Marion County, is challenged in this action as denying certain voters the equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The specific statutory provisions under attack allow four city-county councilmen elected at large from the entire Uni-Gov area (a) to sit on the councils of special police and fire districts, the territory of which consists of only part of the Uni-Gov area, (b) to vote at Uni-Gov council meetings on the business of those special districts, and (c) to vote on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shirley Pittman, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Chicago Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Bjornestad v. HulseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Clark County v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Collins v. Town of GoshenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. May v. Town of Mountain VillageDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API