Legal Opinion

Deaton v. Coble

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1956No. 531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

The statute of frauds, G.S. 22-1, in pertinent part provides that “no action shall be brought ... to charge any defendant upon a special promise to answer the debt, default or miscarriage of another person, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party charged therewith . . .”

Testing the paper writing sued on by the provision of this statute, it is seen that it lacks the essential of a “special promise to answer the debt ... of another person” the plaintiff. The second sentence is incomplete, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Chapel Hill Spa Health Club, Inc. v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MidaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Marvel Lamp Co. v. CapelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API