Legal Opinion
Love v. Couch
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 9, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ButiíEk, J.
The appellants were the owners of oil properties in Union County on which two or more small producing wells had been brought in. In November, 1921., for reasons about which there is -some dispute, an arrangement was effected by which these properties were purchased by the appellee, to be developed and operated by a corporation. The terms of the agreement were set out in the following instrument:
“This memorandum of agreement, made this the 7th day of November, 1921, by and between H. C. Couch and associates, M. W. Love and Love Brothers, Incorporated, witnesseth:
‘ ‘ That M. W. Love…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holland v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. CorkilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Zimmerman v. Western & Southern Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Gilbert v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Hirsch v. Cadrin & StatenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by22 opinions
- Morgan Distributing Company, Inc. v. Unidynamic Corporation (Formerly Known as Umc Industries, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Williams v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Alan Curtis LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Bridgman v. DrillingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Les-Bil, Inc. v. General Waterworks Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.