Legal Opinion
Hinds v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 25, 2022No. 4:18-cv-01431Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHELLE HINDS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01431-JSW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE PAGA CLAIM ASSERTED 9 v. AGAINST DEFENDANT FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. 10 FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 180 11 Defendants. 12 13 On January 3, 2022, the Court reserved ruling on Defendant FedEx Ground Package 14 System, Inc.’s (“FedEx”) motion to strike Plaintiffs’ claim under the California Labor Code 15 Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Dkt. No. 184, “January 3 Order”. The Court has 16…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Donohue v. AMN Services, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.