Legal Opinion

Brelie v. Klafter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20046. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error, Henry Brelie, began an action of assumpsit in the superior court of Cook county against defendants in error, David S. and Amanda E. Klafter, to recover $22,858.91, being the earnest money advanced by plaintiff in error under a contract for the purchase of 650.5 acres of Florida land at $325 per acre, plaintiff in error claiming that the title to the land was so defective that the sale could not be completed. At the close of all the evidence the trial court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff in error for the amount claimed. An appeal was prosecuted to the Appellate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reid v. BarrySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Woolwine's Adm'r v. Ches. & O. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McCourt v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Key v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. D'Wolf v. PrattIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago & NW Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Wilfong v. W. A. Schickedanz Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Binder v. HejhalIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. May v. NymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API