Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Teasdale

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2005No. 04-0322-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee that Attorney Clay E Teasdale be publicly reprimanded for having committed two counts of professional misconduct in connection with his representation of J.S. in a personal injury matter. In addition, the referee recommended that Attorney Teasdale be required to pay restitution to the client, as well as the costs of this disciplinary proceeding.

¶ 2. We determine that the seriousness of Attorney Teasdale's professional misconduct warrants a public reprimand. We also determine that Attorney Teasdale should he required to make restitution to his…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API