Disciplinary Proceedings Against Teasdale
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee that Attorney Clay E Teasdale be publicly reprimanded for having committed two counts of professional misconduct in connection with his representation of J.S. in a personal injury matter. In addition, the referee recommended that Attorney Teasdale be required to pay restitution to the client, as well as the costs of this disciplinary proceeding.
¶ 2. We determine that the seriousness of Attorney Teasdale's professional misconduct warrants a public reprimand. We also determine that Attorney Teasdale should he required to make restitution to his…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005