Barham v. Hostetter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County, and from an order dissolving an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action brought by eleven plaintiffs to restrain an alleged diversion of the waters of a certain creek, by the defendant, and for damages for such alleged diversion.
The appeal is prosecuted from the judgment of the trial court in dismissing the action, and from an order dissolving a preliminary injunction.
*273The judgment roll discloses that a demurrer was interposed to the complaint, and that it was sustained, and the plaintiffs declining to amend upon leave given, the action was dismissed with costs against plaintiffs.
This judgment of dismissal was made on the 4th day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCourtney v. FortuneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Churchill v. LauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Foreman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- Williams v. NeddoIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.