Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Herman Van Noy Drilling

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1981No. 54557PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court sitting en banc determining that Donovan I. Eaton, as claimant, was barred from prosecuting a claim against the respondent, Herman Van Noy Drilling Company. The order of the Workers’ Compensation Court sitting en banc found that the claimant had suffered the injury complained of in October or November of 1977, and his claim for compensation was not filed with the Workers’ Compensation Court until March 5, 1979. That court therefore found and determined the claim to be barred by the running of the statute of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. MacKlanburg-duncan Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Smedley v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Esmark/Vickers Petroleum v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. McCombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. In Re 1973 John Deere 4030 TractorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Edward v. GEC, LLCSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  5. Parsons v. OXY USA, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API