Legal Opinion · Dissent

Riddle Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1974No. Appeals, 1170 and 1171Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

Although the majority properly concluded that the lower court erred in declaring a mistrial in the instant matter, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s find*77ing that this improper declaration does not bar further litigation on the issue of appellee’s paternity of an illegitimate child. Further proceedings against the appellee are banned by the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Commonwealth constitutions.

There is no substance for the majority finding that bastardy is not crime. Bastardy is a crime for which the legislature has imposed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DillworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. RichbourgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. JodlowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API