Legal Opinion

Reimer v. Surgical Services of the Great Plains, P.C.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2000No. S-98-511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellants, James V. Reimer and Barbara Jensen, the personal representatives of the estate of Louis W. Reimer, Jr. (Reimer), filed this medical malpractice action against the appellees, Thomas C. Howard, M.D., and his employer, Surgical Services of the Great Plains, P.C. During trial, the district court refused to allow the appellants to question one of Howard’s expert witnesses regarding whether the expert and Howard carried professional liability insurance issued by the same com*673pany. The trial court also refused to give a causation instruction that utilized the term “substantial factor”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Otwell v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Kudlacek v. Fiat S.P.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mills v. GrotheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Mendoza v. VaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Doe v. Gunny's Ltd. PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chapa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Wells v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  3. Reimer v. SURGICAL SERV. OF GREAT PLAINSNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fernando Chapa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API