Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. New Mexico Public Service Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1984No. 14852PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from the Public Service Commission’s (Commission) decision that the coal costs incurred by Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) during the year 1980 were reasonable. PNM initially came before the Commission seeking an increase in rates based upon 1980 operating expenses. The parties stipulated to all issues except the issue of the justness and reasonableness of certain costs resulting from PNM’s purchase of coal from its affiliate, Western Coal Company (WCC). Following hearings in which the Attorney General (AG) participated, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fox v. DoakNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Public Service Company of New Mexico v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. PNM Gas Services v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Sandel v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API