Legal Opinion

Card v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2010No. 1:08-CV-2325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATHLEEN M. O’MALLEY, District Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiff Linda Card’s (“Card”) motion for class certification and appointment of counsel [dkt. 19] and Defendant City of Cleveland’s (“Cleveland”) motion for summary judgment [dkt. 22].

For the following reasons, the court GRANTS Card’s motion for class certification and DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Cleveland’s motion for summary judgment.

I. Background

On October 9, 2009, Card filed her Second Amended Complaint alleging one count of *283gender discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e et seq. (commonly…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Advanced Dermatology v. Plaza Research CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API