Legal Opinion
Weinberger v. New York Stock Exchange
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1975No. 69 Civ. 4461PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Bernard Weinberger, a former limited partner in the now defunct brokerage firm of Ira Haupt & Co. (“Haupt”), commenced this action against defendant, New York Stock Exchange (“Exchange”), on October 9, 1969. An amended complaint was filed on January 22, 1970. Issue was joined and the case was submitted to the Court for decision on a stipulated record in lieu of trial. Thereafter, the parties filed “post-trial” memoranda and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Oral argument was heard on June 2, 1975.
Plaintiff, a retired clothing store…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,929 Theodore B. Wessel v. L. M. Buhler and N. A. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Baird v. FranklineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,865 James Arneil and Vernon A. Stockwell v. James B. Ramsey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Carr v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Lank v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Murphy v. McDonnell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.