Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curry v. McCanless

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1939No. 339Published

1DissentJustice Butler

The sole question is whether, on the facts about to be stated, the Tennessee inheritance tax law, consistently with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, may be extended to intangible- personal property evidenced by certificates of stock and bonds .held in Alabama.

The suit was brought in a chancery court of Tennessee under the declaratory judgments act of that State.1 Com- - *375plainants were the Nashville Trust Company, a Tennessee corporation appointed by the will of Mrs. Grace C. Scales as executor for Tennessee, and the Title Guarantee Loan & Trust Compány, which will be…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Porter v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API