Legal Opinion

Argonaut Builders, Inc. v. Dare

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1961No. 19339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in an action to recover money alleged to have been loaned to the defendant. By answer, defendant denied that the transactions in question were loans and further alleged that the monies paid to him by the plaintiff were advances on anticipated commissions; that no agreement to repay existed and that consequently plaintiff was not entitled to recover.

Trial was to the court and upon conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  2. Bankers Union Life Insurance v. AtschelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Gross Bergman Manufacturing Co. v. FeilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Agnew v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Amherst Sportswear Company, Inc. v. Mark McManusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Badger v. Nu-Tone Products Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Valoco Building Products, Inc. v. ChafeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API