Legal Opinion

People v. Lisner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1967No. Crim. 12063PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.

Lisner was convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of section 496 of the Penal Code upon an information charging Lisner with receiving 34 cases of stolen liquor worth $2,170, knowing that the property had been stolen, and with concealing and withholding the property from the owner, Sterling Liquor Company, Inc. Lisner’s motion under section 995 of the Penal Code was denied. He pleaded not guilty, and trial by jury was waived. All counsel stipulated that the cause would be submitted on the testimony contained in the transcript of the preliminary hearing, subject to the court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. GreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. Harbor Hut RestaurantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Miller v. ObledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Pinney v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API