Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Scheel
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 19, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Brasser, S.
The executor of the will of Sophia Scheel has obtained an order, on his petition, requiring Arthur G. Schulz, Towlerton-Simpson, Inc., and Frederick C. Donnelly, creditors, to show cause why the decree judicially settling his account, made and filed on December 30, 1941, should not be amended in two particulars.
The first proposed amendment seeks to require Arthur Schulz to pay over to and reimburse the executor in the sum of $200, with which amount the executor is surcharged by reason of an excess payment to Schulz, an undertaker, for the funeral service of decedent.
*938The second…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of ClareNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re StarbuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- In re the Estate of RosenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Accounting of SeidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953