In re Starbuck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
On March 17, 1927, upon a petition pursuant apparently to section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act (as added by Laws of 1923, chap. 526), the surrogate held a hearing to fix and determine the sendees of Graef & Arnold, the attorneys for the petitioner, Emma S. Starbuck, as executrix for Charles A. Starbuck,. deceased. On April 5,1927, the return day of the citation, the petitioners appeared in support thereof, as did also the Empire Trust Company and the Bank of the Manhattan Company, creditors, in opposition thereto. A complete disclosure of the entire situation was then had, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re the Several Accountings of the Executors of TildenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Matter of HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- In Re the Accounting of UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Accounting of BishopNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re the Estate of GilfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of DroneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Estate of BloomingdaleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.