Legal Opinion

State v. Covington

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 1, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

It appears that the Baldwin Drainage District was attempted to be established under the statutes and has for many years been operating and recognized by the statutes as having at least a de facto existence with jurisdiction and powers, pursuant to which contractual and other rights have been acquired and not fully discharged; therefore a writ in quo warranto challenging the existence of the district and the authority of its officers will not now be issued. If individual co-relators are entitled to relief upon the. ground that their lands in the district have not been and cannot be in any way…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baldwin Drainage District v. MacClenny Turpentine Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Bostwick v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Baldwin Drainage District v. MacClenny Turpentine Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Millican v. State ex rel. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. United States v. Certain LandsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API