Legal Opinion
Suburban Bank v. Riggsby
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 15, 1984No. 84-2233PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
We asked the parties to this appeal to brief the following question: Is an order by a district judge (1) reversing the dismissal of a claim against a bankrupt’s estate, or, as here, the dismissal of a complaint objecting to discharge, and (2) remanding the case to the bankruptcy judge for further proceedings, on the claim, a final order within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended just this past summer by the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984, Pub.L. 98-353, 98 Stat. 333 (July 10, 1984)? The 1984 amendments, so far as relevant here,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riggsby v. RiggsbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Security Pacific Bank Washington v. Steinberg (In re Westwood Shake & Shingle, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Watman v. Groman (Watman)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2004