Legal Opinion

State v. Flemming

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1993No. 18224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Benny J. Flemming (Defendant) guilty of distributing a controlled substance, a class B felony. He was sentenced to a term of five years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, Defendant contends (1) he was entitled to a new trial because the State failed to disclose “all written statements or notes of the Missouri State Highway Patrol which had been requested by the Defendant,” (2) he was entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.

On our review we must accept as true all evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. GilmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. CaseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. RoarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. KuhlenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. NenningerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. LeitnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API