State v. Deschenes

[¶ 1] Michael Deschenes appeals from the judgments entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Humphrey, J.) following a consolidated trial and conviction by a jury on two charges of operating under the influence (Class D), 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411(1) (1996). 1 On appeal, Deschenes contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove operation or attempt ed operation for either charge. Because admissions may constitute sufficient evidence of operation or attempted operation of a motor vehicle and there is sufficient evidence as to both crimes for which Des-chenes was convicted, we affirm.

I.…