State v. Deering
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] George Michael Deering appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) following a jury-waived trial at which he was found guilty of aggravated furnishing of a schedule Z drug in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1105 (1983 & Supp.1997). 1 On appeal Deering argues that because the trier of fact found that he possessed less than 1)4 ounces of marijuana, he cannot be convicted of aggravated furnishing as a matter of law. Alternatively, Deering contends that there was insufficient evidence for the trier of fact to find that he possessed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. GellersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. PeakesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- State v. BlackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. MillikenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. DillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.