Legal Opinion

State v. Deering

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 29, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] George Michael Deering appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) following a jury-waived trial at which he was found guilty of aggravated furnishing of a schedule Z drug in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1105 (1983 & Supp.1997). 1 On appeal Deering argues that because the trier of fact found that he possessed less than 1)4 ounces of marijuana, he cannot be convicted of aggravated furnishing as a matter of law. Alternatively, Deering contends that there was insufficient evidence for the trier of fact to find that he possessed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. GellersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. State v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. PeakesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. State v. BlackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. State v. MillikenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. State v. DillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API