Balboa Realty Co. v. Brenglass Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for fraud and deceit alleged to have been practiced in connection with the sale of a lot by the defendants, the owner and the auctioneer who sold it to the plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that the auctioneer represented that lot 40, the one in dispute, was a corner lot, whereas in fact it was not On the other hand, the auctioneer contends that he represented lot 40 to be a comer lot according to the city map, that no fraud was perpetrated by him, that there was no intention to deceive the plaintiff, and that in fact it was not deceived.
In order to recover…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Marsh v. FalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Bernheimer v. . RindskopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marcus v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Arndt v. AltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Jones v. BurtonNew York Supreme Court · 1957