Lawrence Lennon v. City of Carmel, Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Although people raise an astonishing variety of claims in the federal courts of this country, the fact remains that there are limits on the subject-matter jurisdiction of those courts. This ease implicates one of those limits: the federal district courts are not authorized to sit in review of state-court decisions, unless Congress has passed appropriate legislation. This is so even if one or all parties would like an answer from the federal court. As the district court here recognized, nearly all of the case now before us runs afoul of this jurisdictional rule. We affirm its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Kevin Carmody v. Board of Trustees of the UniveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Jamie Swartz v. Heartland Equine RescueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Milsap v. Habitat Co. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- ADAMS v. FELDKAMPDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.