Legal Opinion

Armour v. Pecker

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 7, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, C. J.

This is replevin for fifty barrels of whiskey, sold by the plaintiffs, merchants in New York, through their agent, John L. Pugh, in Cincinnati, to George Simmons, of Boston, and sold or pledged by Simmons to the defendants. At the trial in the Superior Court, the plaintiffs sought to recover upon two distinct grounds: 1st. That the sale of the whiskey by them to Simmons was upon a condition which had not been performed. *1442d. Tliat Simmons purchased the whiskey not intending to pay , for it, and that the defendants were not bond fide purchasers. The verdict was for the plaintiffs. To the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Hirschorn v. CanneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. First Unitarian Soc. of Chicago v. FaulknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Lang v. RickmersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Southern Pine Co. of Georgia v. Savannah Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  5. Victor Safe & Lock Co. v. Texas State Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API