St. Paul Manor, Inc. v. Golburgh
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
In this action of summary process the judge found for the plaintiff for possession. The defendant excepted to this finding and to the denial of certain requests for rulings. Of these the only one pressed before us is the third, which reads: “The letter dated May 17, 1965 did not constitute a notice sufficient to terminate said lease.” The denial of this request in the *785circumstances appearing in this record was not erroneous. The premises covered by the lease were an apartment at 22 St. Paul Street, Brookline, which was occupied by the defendant’s son. In the negotiations for the lease the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. KeliherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Ashkenazy v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Steese v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897