Legal Opinion

Ashkenazy v. O'Neill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract for the use and occupation of certain premises. G. L. c. 231, § 7, Eighth. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the defendants’ exception.

The plaintiff was the owner of an apartment house consisting of five apartments; one on the first floor; two on the second floor, one with three rooms, and the other with four, and both having kitchenette and bath; and two apartments on the third floor, each consisting of three rooms, kitchenette and bath. On November 11, 1923, the defendants paid the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Steese v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connors v. WickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Rome v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. U-Dryvit Auto Rental Co. v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Ryan v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Chapman v. StandenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API