Ashkenazy v. O'Neill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract for the use and occupation of certain premises. G. L. c. 231, § 7, Eighth. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the defendants’ exception.
The plaintiff was the owner of an apartment house consisting of five apartments; one on the first floor; two on the second floor, one with three rooms, and the other with four, and both having kitchenette and bath; and two apartments on the third floor, each consisting of three rooms, kitchenette and bath. On November 11, 1923, the defendants paid the plaintiff for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walker v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Steese v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Connors v. WickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Rome v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- U-Dryvit Auto Rental Co. v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ryan v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Chapman v. StandenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.