Legal Opinion

Interstate Power Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1936No. 26347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

On February 20, 1934, the city of Cushing held an election to determine whether it should incur indebtedness and issue bonds for erection of an electr'ic power plant. . The election carried in favor of the bonds by a substantial majority. Thei plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, filed an action contesting the election, and thereafter on May 15, 1934, this court ordered the trial judge disqualified and another judge was assigned to conduct the trial in his place. The plaintiff then dismissed its action without prejudice. Shortly thereafter, on September 5, 1934, Jack Hughes and others…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dooley v. ForemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Hughes v. City of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Belt v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API