Francisco Juarez-Ramos v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
I
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and an immigration judge (IJ) held that an expedited removal order in 1999 interrupted Francisco Juarez-Ramos’s physical presence in the United States. Thus, they held that Juarez-Ramos could not establish the required ten years of physical presence necessary to be eligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). In his petition for review, Juarez-Ramos argues that an expedited removal order should not interrupt an alien’s continuous physical presence because so little process is involved in issuing such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Delfino Vasquez-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jose De Jesus Tapia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Francisco Alcaraz Leticia Cardenas Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- AVILEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
3Cited by42 opinions
- Valadez-Munoz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Vasquez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Neftali Landin-Zavala v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gustavo Nunez-Moron v. Eric HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Gomez Zarate v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.