Legal Opinion

Francisco Juarez-Ramos v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2007No. 05-72472, 05-75364PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

I

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and an immigration judge (IJ) held that an expedited removal order in 1999 interrupted Francisco Juarez-Ramos’s physical presence in the United States. Thus, they held that Juarez-Ramos could not establish the required ten years of physical presence necessary to be eligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). In his petition for review, Juarez-Ramos argues that an expedited removal order should not interrupt an alien’s continuous physical presence because so little process is involved in issuing such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Delfino Vasquez-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Jose De Jesus Tapia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Francisco Alcaraz Leticia Cardenas Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. AVILEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Valadez-Munoz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Vasquez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. Neftali Landin-Zavala v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Gustavo Nunez-Moron v. Eric HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Gomez Zarate v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API