Legal Opinion

Whims v. Marco

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1934No. Civ. No. 9319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for the balance of the purchase price of certain shares of stock or “promotional interests”, basing his action upon a written contract which was pleaded in full. Plaintiff had judgment and the defendants appeal on typewritten transcripts.

There are but two points raised by appellants which require consideration. First, whether the complaint states a cause of action for the detriment caused by the breach of the buyers’ agreement to accept and pay for the stock. In such a case the measure of plaintiff’s recovery is the contract price (see. 3310, Civ. Code). The contract provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Nielsen v. SwanbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Tucker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lewin v. HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blake v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API