Legal Opinion
Cassell v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided December 14, 2004No. 1:03 CV 00809PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On June 8, 2004, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on Plaintiff and a copy was given to the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mother's Restaurant Incorporated v. Mama's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Orca Yachts, L.L.C. v. Mollicam, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sartin v. MacIkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Sartin v. MacIkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- TitleMax of South Carolina Inc v. SpicherDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025