Legal Opinion

Sartin v. MacIk

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2008No. 07-1464PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL joined. Chief Judge WILLIAMS wrote a dissenting opinion.

*286OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we confront a question of North Carolina law that the state courts have yet to address. We must determine whether a state default judgment, entered as a penalty for a party’s failure to comply with a North Carolina court’s discovery order, has collateral estoppel effect in subsequent litigation in bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy court, in a decision upheld by the district court, found…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Clay v. Sun Ins. Office Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Halscott Megaro, P.A. v. Henry McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  2. Mullins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
  4. Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. LeCann v. Cobham (In re Cobham)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API