Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Finnigan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 1, 1950PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This, is a complaint to a District Court, alleging that the defendant, on December 7, 1949, and on divers later days, did practise dentistry without being duly registered as a dentist according to law. On appeal to the Superior Court, he was found guilty and fined. He claimed an appeal to this court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 278, § 28.

There was no oral evidence. The case was submitted to the Superior Court upon a statement of agreed facts, substantially as follows. The defendant was not a registered dentist, and was not working under the direction of one. He was resorted to by persons having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. Henry's Drywall Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API