Commonwealth v. Finnigan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This, is a complaint to a District Court, alleging that the defendant, on December 7, 1949, and on divers later days, did practise dentistry without being duly registered as a dentist according to law. On appeal to the Superior Court, he was found guilty and fined. He claimed an appeal to this court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 278, § 28.
There was no oral evidence. The case was submitted to the Superior Court upon a statement of agreed facts, substantially as follows. The defendant was not a registered dentist, and was not working under the direction of one. He was resorted to by persons having…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. Henry's Drywall Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.