Legal Opinion

Tinkham v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 7, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

“The plea in abatement is bad. It does not fully set out the record of the prior action. The rule is uniform in this state, that a defendant, who by plea in abatement relies on the record or process of any court, must enroll in or with his plea the record or process on which he relies. Smith v. Insurance Co., 22 N. H. [21], 25.” Ladd v. Stratton, 59 N. H. 200.

The argument of the defendant in the case at bar, that the rule as to enrollment does not apply when both cases are in the same court, cannot prevail. That was the situation in the case above quoted from, and the point was then fully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ladd v. StrattonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Adams v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. Lacoss v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  4. Associated Home Utilities, Inc. v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Dolber v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API