Dolber v. Young
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
The plaintiff predicates her claim to jurisdiction on (1) personal service within the state, (2) written acceptance of service by defendant’s attorney, (3) special appearance by counsel which had become general.(1) Non-resident parties and witnesses are privileged from service of process while in attendance upon, going to, or returning from the trial of a cause. Process dependent upon service so made is subject to .abatement. Ela v. Ela, 68 N. H. 312, 313; Martin v. Whitney, 74 N. H. 505, 506, and cases there cited. The court has found that at the time of the service of the writ the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patten v. PattenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Ela v. ElaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Hoyt v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Tinkham v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
- Martin v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Brainard v. Dist. Court of Eighth Judicial District Ex Rel. Natrona CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Nelson v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- Fischer v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.