Legal Opinion
City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1941No. 4573PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Bernalillo County, holding that, where two assessments were levied against the same property at different times, one under Chap. 133, Session Laws 1923, and one under Chap. 140, Laws 1923, as amended by Chap. 45, Laws 1927, the assessment first levied is superior, or that priority in time controls. District Judge Johnson, in deciding the case, delivered a very able opinion as follows: .
“The City of Albuquerque filed this suit to foreclose certain paving liens created pursuant to Chapter 133 of the 1923 Session Laws.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Des Moines Brick Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Waltom v. City of PortalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- D' Gette v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co. v. Aztec Gold Mining & Milling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1908
- Midway Realty Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Altman v. KilburnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. JimenezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- INA GROUP, LLC v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JimenezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017