Legal Opinion
Environmental Transportation System, Inc. v. Ensco, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided April 24, 1991No. 89-4001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Before the Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, each of these Motions is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In 1984 the Defendant Northern States Power (“NSP”) decided to dispose of certain hazardous or toxic chemicals being stored at its plant near Minneapolis, Minnesota. The hazardous chemicals were poly-chlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) and were stored in large drums called “transformers.” NSP contracted with Defendant EN-SCO, Inc. (“ENSCO”) for the removal and disposal of the transformers and the PCBs they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Alfred MECHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- T & E INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Safety Light Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Superior Engraving Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Environmental Transportation Systems, Inc. v. ENSCO, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- One Wheeler Road Associates v. Foxboro Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Enenco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
- Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Aigner Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.