Legal Opinion

Harris v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1932No. 21432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action brought by defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, to recover damages for injuries inflicted upon her by a dog, alleged to have been owned and kept by plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants.

The petition alleges that plaintiff was bitten by a Collie Shepherd dog owned and kept by defendants, while she was walking-along a public street and on the sidewalk in front of the premises occupied by defendants ; that the dog was vicious and dangerous and known so to be by defendants.

Defendants are husband and wife. Defendant J. I. Harris, the husband,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ayers v. MacOughtrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Peerson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Tidal Oil Co. v. ForcumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Colvin v. ColvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API