Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andrew L. Ward, Jr. v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2019No. 2018-CA-00285-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶26. Were this case governed by general contract law, I might agree with the majority's position that no genuine issues of material fact exist on whether Larry Seward waived his right to recover from Illinois Central Railroad for the brain cancer that ultimately killed him. But this case arose under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), which was intended "to provide liberal recovery for injured workers." Kernan v. Am. Dredging Co. , 355 U.S. 426 , 432, 78 S.Ct. 394 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 382 (1958) (citing Rogers v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co. , 352 U.S. 500 ,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Wicker v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Wallace v. United Mississippi BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jaqua v. Canadian National RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API