Incorporated Town of Scranton v. Danenbaum
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Greene Dislricl Gourk. — IioN. S. II. Elwood, Judge. The defendant was fined for failing to- pay tbe license required "of him as a transient merchant, and appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The trial court fo-und the defendant to have been a transient merchant at the time the information was filed, and this conclusion has such support in the evidence as to preclude any interference on our part. But the ap-pel-.lant contends there was no .proof of an ordinance fixing the license for transient merchants, or imposing a penalty fo-r its violation. Formerly such an objection would have been fatal to the record, as an ordinance, being in the nature of a private statute, must have been pleaded and proven. Garvin v. Wells, 8 Iowa, 286; Goodrich v. Brown, 30 Iowa, 291; Wolf 1 v. City of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Solomon v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Downing v. City of MiltonvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Garvin v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Goodrich v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- State ex rel. City of Dubuque v. LeiberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- City of Des Moines v. ReiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- City of Milbank v. CronlokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Strauss v. Village of ConneautAshtabula Circuit Court · 1902
- Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939