Legal Opinion

Downing v. City of Miltonvale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Cloud District Court. Prosecution for a violation of an ordinance of the City of Miltonvale, by disturbing the peace and quiet of certain persons in said city. Trial before the police judge, conviction, and appeal to the district court. Trial at the October Term, 1886; conviction, and sentence to pay a fine of $10 and costs. The defendant Downing appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Clogston, C.:

The only question in this case is: Was the ordinance under which the defendant was convicted, valid? The objections urged are, first, that the court erred in admitting in evidence the ordinance book containing the ordinance under which the defendant was prosecuted; second, that the ordinance book and journal of the proceedings of the city council show that the said ordinance was not legally passed and published. The journal shows that the ordinance, *741being ordinance number 12, came regularly up at a public meeting of the city council, and was passed, all the members of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. City of Solomon v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Foley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Portland v. YickOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Collins v. City of RadfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. City of Lewiston v. FraryIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Markham v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API