Legal Opinion

Bicknell v. Bicknell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, C. J.

The action is in favor of Jane A. Bicknell against Rachel A. Bicknell and George O. Bicknell, both infants under the age of twenty-one years. The mother of the defendants is dead, and the plaintiff is their step-mother. The action is for money had and received, and for money lent. The answer is signed by the defendants’ attorney, which is an irregularity, and the plaintiff’s husband is their guardian ad litem. Such an appointment should never be made, for the guardian ad litem should always be a disinterested person, with no interests to regard except those of the infant defendants.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thacher v. DinsmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rollins v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Houck v. BridwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Johnson v. NewberryTexas Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API